The power of creative dissent to express dissent and challenge societal norms has been a defining characteristic of human creativity throughout history. From the works of Pablo Picasso and Spanish Civil War, to the street art of Banksy in modern-day New York, art has long been a potent medium for social commentary and expression.

One of the most effective ways in which art can be used as a form of statement is through its ability to amplify silenced communities. Artists like Barbara Kruger have used installations to critique the way in which women are represented in society, while artists like Kerry James Marshall have used painting to challenge the dominant narratives surrounding African American culture.

In addition to amplifying marginalized voices, art can also be used to challenge dominant power structures. Artists like Ai Weiwei have used sculpture to speak out against government repression, while artists like the Squid Soup have used direct action to raise awareness about racism in the art world.

Moreover, art has the power to humanize the struggles of individuals and communities, creating a sense of lived experience between the viewer and the artist. This is perhaps most evident in the work of artists like Amy Sherald, who use portraiture to humanize the lives of underrepresented groups, while artists like Lynn Hershman Leeson have used installation to raise awareness about the opioid crisis and the struggles of socially excluded groups.

In conclusion, the use of art as a form of protest is a powerful legacy of artistic creativity. By harnessing the emotional resonance of art, artists and activists have been able to convey powerful declarations that inspire transformation and challenge the dominant narratives. Whether through installation, the possibilities for using international art competition as a form of protest are boundless, and it remains an essential tool for social commentary in the modern world.